|
[[Here begins MS fragment
1:]]
Lewis Gaylord
Clarke [[Clark]].
Mr Clarke
[[Mr. Clark]]
is known principally as the twin brother of the late Willis Gaylord
Clarke
[[Clark]], the poet -- with whom he has been often confounded from
similarity
both of person and of name. He is known, also, within a more
limited
circle, as one of the editors of the "Knickerbocker," a monthly
magazine;
and it is in this latter capacity that I must be considered as placing
him among literary people. He writes little himself -- the
scraps which appear at the end of the "Knickerbocker" being the joint
work
of a great variety of gentlemen -- many of them shrewd and clever --
connected
with diverse Sunday papers about the city of New-York. With a
little
more pains taken in elevating the tone of Mr C's "Editors'
Table"
I should have no hesitation in ranking it with even the spiciest
editorial
matter of the late "Polyanthos".
I must
not be understood
as saying that Mr Clarke [[Mr. Clark]] does not occasionally contribute
to the magazine; for he once did me the honor of reviewing my poems and
I -- forgave him. His compostions, however,]][[Here
ends MS fragment 1, and begins MS
fragment 2:]] are
far from numerous, and may be distinguished by their style, which is
more
-- "more easily to be imagined than described." Their merit is
peculiar;
but I do not wish to commit myself in maintaining that either "force"
or
"impressiveness" is the precise term by which that merit should be
designated.
"The Knickerbocker" has been
long established,
and has in it some elements of success. Its title is as good as
any
one so rigidly local can be; and, in the matter of periodicals, few
persons
are aware of the vital [[several words are lost at the cut edge]] and
inanity
of the words "Sou [[Here ends MS fragment 1, fragment 2 is
missing.]][[Here
begins MS fragment 3, on a new
page:] praiseworthy;
the mechanical execution excellent; and assuredly there has been no
lack
of exertion in the way of what is termed "putting the work before the
eye
of the public." Still, an incubus seems to sit obstinately upon
it, and for many years past it has ceased to hold any position among
intelligent
readers. On account of the manner in which it is necessarily edited,
the
journal is deficient in that absolutely indispensable element,
individuality.
It is full of contradictory opinions -- objects. As the nominal editor
has no precise character, his magazine can have none, as a matter of
course.
Mr Clarke [[Mr. Clark]], as a literary, -- I have no personal
acquaintance
with him -- has no determinateness, distinctiveness -- saliency. A
pumpkin,
in fact, has more angles -- and is altogether a cleverer thing. The
"editor
of the Knickerbocker" is noticeable for nothing in the world but for
the
peculiarity of being noticeable for nothing.
Perhaps I am too hasty, however, in
asserting this;
his scholastic aptitude for conducting a magazine of polite literature,
is a point which must have elicited attention. In three lines,
for
example, referring to the "Broadway Journal" and printed, in the
"Knickerbocker"
for July 1845, among the customary editorial paragraphs of a type so
small
as to be nearly invisible and put to so stupid a use as to make every
body
wish it were quite so -- in the compass of these three lines he quotes,
as I now write it, the French proverb chaçun à son
gout;
taking pains to compliment the hard c in "chacun" with a
cedilla -- to omit the circumflex accent on "goût" -- and
to place a grave one on the verb "a", supposing it to be the
preposition
-- if indeed he has any idea what "verb" and "preposition" mean, or can
tell the difference between the one and the other. Moreover, it is an
awful
although a scarecly conceivable fact that, within the compass of
these
same three lines, he as contrived, by some amazing effort of
ingenuity,
to crowd another similar blunder about "a nil admirari critic"
--
some malicious vagabond, I presume, among his schoolboy acquaintances,
having quizzed him with the information that "to admire
nothing"
is the meaning of "nil admirari". [back of page:]
What is the precise circulation
of the "Knickerbocker"
at present I am unable to say; it has been variously stated at from
seven
hundred to fifteen hundred copies; the latter estimate is
unquestionably
too high; and the former, I presume, is too low. It is impossible,
however,
that the magazine can long exist unless a radical alteration be made in
its editorial conduct.
Mr Clarke [[Mr. Clark]] is, perhaps,
forty-five or
six years of age and still a good-looking man. The forehead is,
phrenologically,
bad — round and what is termed "bullety." The mouth, however, is much
better
-- although the smile is too continual and inane -- inexpresive --
occasionally
degenerating into a simper. Hair and whiskers dark -- somewhat
interspersed
with grey -- the latter meeting voluminously beneath the chin. In
height
five feet ten or eleven. In the street might be considered a
"personable"
man. In society I have never had the pleasure of meeting him.
|
|