|
'THE GIFT.'
THE GIFT
is an
American annual
of great typographical elegance, and embellished with many beautiful
engravings.
It contains an article, which, for several reasons, appears to us so
remarkable,
that we leave aside several effusions of our ordinary contributors in
order
to make room for an abridgment of it. The writer, Mr Edgar A. Poe, is
evidently
an acute observer of mental phenomena; and we have to thank him for one
of the aptest illustrations which could well be conceived, of that
curious
play of two minds, in which one person, let us call him A., guesses
what
another, B, will do, judging that B will adopt a particular line of
policy
to circumvent A.
THE PURLOINED LETTER.
At Paris, just after dark, one gusty
evening in
the
autumn of 18—, I was enjoying the twofold luxury of meditation and a
meerschaum,
in company with my friend C. Auguste Dupin, in his little back library,
or book-closet, au troisiême, No. 33, Rue Dunôt, Faubourg
St.
Germain. For one hour at least we had maintained a profound silence,
when
the door of our apartment was thrown open, and admitted our old
acquaintance,
Monsieur G——, the Prefect of the Parisian police.
We gave him a hearty welcome. The
Prefect sat
down,
and shortly disclosed a most perpelexing case, in which his
professional
services had been inrequisition. His story was this. 'I have received
information
that a certain document, of the last importance, has been purloined
from
the royal apartments. The individual who purloined it is known; this is
beyond a doubt, for he was seen to take it. It is known, also, that it
still remains in his possession. The person on whom the was committed
is
a certain royal personage, a female, over whom the holder of the
document
has gained by this means a dangerous ascendancy — her honour and peace
are jeopardized.'
'But this ascendancy,' I interposed,
'would
depend
upon the robber's knowledge of the loser's knowledge of the robber. Who
would dare ——'
'The thief,' said G——, 'is the
Minister D——, who
dares all things — those unbecoming, as well as those becoming a man.
The
method of the theft was not less ingenious than bold. The document in
question,
a letter, had been received by the personage robbed while alone in the
royal boudoir. During its perusal, she was suddenly interrupted
by the entrance of another exalted individual, from whom especially it
was her wish to conceal it. After a hurried and vain endeavour to
thrust
it in a drawer, she was forced to place it, open as it was, upon a
table.
The address, however, was uppermost; and the contents thus unexposed,
the
letter [page 344:] escaped notice. At this
juncture
enters the Minister D——. His lynx eye immediately perceives the paper,
recognises the handwriting of the address, observes the confusion of
the
personage addressed, and fathoms her secret. After some business
transactions,
hurried through in his ordinary manner, he produces a letter somewhat
similar
to the one in question, opens it, pretends to read it, and then places
it in close juxtaposition to the other. Again he converses, for some
fifteen
minutes, upon the public affairs. At length, in taking leave, he takes
also from the table the letter to which he had no claim. Its rightful
owner
saw, but, of course, dared not call attention to the act, in the
presence
of the third personage who stood at her elbow. The minister decamped;
leaving
his own letter — one of no importance — upon the
table.'
'Here, then,' said Dupin to me, 'you have precisely what you demand to
make the ascendancy complete — the robber's knowledge of the loser's
knowledge
of the robber.' 'Yes,' replied the Prefect; 'and the power thus
attained
has, for some months past, been wielded, for political purposes, to a
very
dangerous extent. The personage robbed is more thoroughly convinced,
every
day, of the necessity of reclaiming her letter. But this, of course,
cannot
be done openly. In fine, driven to despair, she has committed the
matter
to me.'
'It is clear,' said I, 'as you
observe, that the
letter is still in possession of the minister; since it is this
possession,
and not any employment of the letter, which bestows the power. With the
employment the power departs.'
'True,' said G——: 'and upon this
conviction I
proceeded.
My first care was to make thorough search of the minister's hotel; and
here my chief embarrassment lay in the necessity of searching without
his
knowledge. Beyond all things, I have been warned of the danger which
would
result from giving him reason to suspect our design.'
'But,' said I, 'you are quite au
fait in
these
investigations. The Parisian police have done this thing often before.'
'O yes; and for this reason I did not
despair.
The
habits of the minister gave me, too, a great advantage. He is
frequently
absent from home all night. His servants are by no means numerous. They
sleep at a distance from their master's apartments, and, being chiefly
Neapolitans, are readily made drunk. I have keys, as you know, with
which
I can open any chamber or cabinet in Paris. For three months a night
has
not passed, during the greater part of which I have not been engaged,
personally,
in ransacking the D—— Hotel. My honor is interested, and, to mention a
great secret, the reward is enormous. So I did not abandon the search
until
I had become fully satisfied that the thief is a more astute man than
myself.
I fancy that I have investigated every nook and corner of the premises
in which it is possible that the paper can be concealed. Yet, neither
is
the letter on hte person of the minister. He has been twice waylaid, as
if by footpads, and his person rigorously searched under my own
inspection.'
'Suppose you detail,' said I, 'the
particulars of
your search of the premises.'
'Why the fact is, we took our time,
and we
searched
every
where. I have had long experience in these affairs. I took the
entire
building, room by room; devoting the nights of a whole week to each. We
examined, first, the furniture of each apartment. We opened every
possible
drawer; and I presume you know that, to a properly trained police
agent,
such a thing as a secret drawer is impossible. Any man is a
dolt
who permits a 'secret' drawer to escape him in a search of this
kind. The thing is so plain. There is a certain amount of bulk
—
of space — to be accounted for in every cabinet. Then we have accurate
rules. The fiftieth part of a line could not escape us. After the
cabinets
we took the chairs. The cushions we probed with the fine long needles
you
have seen me employ. From the tables we removed the tops.' 'Why
so?'
'Sometimes the top of a table, or
other similarly
arranged piece of furniture, is removed by the person wishing to
conceal
an article; then the leg is excavated, [column 2:]
the article deposited within the cavity, and the top replaced. The
bottoms
and tops of bedposts are employed in the same way.'
'But could not the cavity be detected
by
sounding?'
I asked.
'By no means, if, when the article is
deposited,
a sufficient wadding of cotton be placed around it. Besides, in our
case,
we were obliged to proceed without noise.'
'But you could not have removed — you
could not
have
taken to pieces all articles of furniture in which it would
have
been possible to make a deposit in the manner you mention. A letter may
be compressed into a thin spiral roll, not differing much in shape or
bulk
from a large knitting-needle, and in this form it might be inserted
into
the rung of a chair, for example. You did not take to pieces all the
chairs?'
'Certainly not; but we did better —
we examined
the
rungs of every chair in the hotel, and, indeed the jointings of every
description
of furniture, by the aid of a most powerful microscope. Had there been
any traces of recent disturbance we should not have failed to detect it
instanter. A single grain of gimlet-dust, or saw-dust, for example,
would
have been as obvious as an apple. Any disorder in the glueing — any
unusual
gaping in the joints — would have sufficed to insure detection.'
'Of course you looked to the mirrors,
between the
boards and the plates, and you probed the beds and the bed-clothes, as
well as the curtains and carpets.'
'That of course; and when we had
absolutely
completed
every particle of the furniture in this way, then we examined the house
itself. We divided its entire surface into compartments, which we
numbered,
so that none might be missed; then we scrutinized each individual
square
inch throughout the premises, including the two houses immediately
adjoining,
with the microscope, as before.'
'The two houses adjoining!' I
exclaimed; 'you
must
have had a great deal of trouble?'
'We had; but the reward offered is
prodigious.'
'You explored the floors beneath the
carpets?'
'Beyond doubt. We removed every
carpet, and
examined
the boards with the microscope.'
'And the paper on the
walls?'
'Yes.'
'You looked into the cellars?'
'We did; and, as time and labour were
no objects,
we dug up every one of them to the depth of four feet.'
'Then,' I said, 'you have been making
a
miscalculation,
and the letter is not upon the premises, as you suppose.'
'I fear you are right there,' said
the Prefect.
'And
now, Dupin, what would you advise me to do?'
'To make a thorough re-search of the
premises.'
'That is absolutely needless,'
replied G——. 'I am
not more sure that I breathe than I am that the letter is not at the
hotel.'
'I have no better advice to give
you,' said
Dupin.
'You have, of course, an accurate description of the letter?'
'Oh yes!' And here the Prefect,
producing a
memorandum-book proceeded to read aloud a minute account of the
internal,
and especially of the external appearance of the missing document. Soon
after finishing the perusal of this description, he took his departure,
more entirely depressed in spirits than I had ever known the good
gentleman
before.
In about a month afterwards he paid
us another
visit,
and found us occupied very nearly as before. He took a pipe and a chair
and entered into some ordinary conversation. At length I said, —
'Well, but G——, what of the purloined
letter? I
presume
you have at last made up your mind that there is no such thing as
overreaching
the Minister?'
'Too true; I made the re-examination,
however, as
Dupin suggested; but it was all labour lost, as I knew it would be.'
'How much was the reward offered, did
you say?'
asked
Dupin. [page 345:]
'Why, a very great deal — a very
liberal
reward
— I don't like to say how much, precisely; but one thing I will
say, that I wouldn't mind giving my individual check for fifty thousand
francs to any one who could obtain me that letter. The fact is, it is
becoming
of more and more importance every day; and the reward has been lately
doubled.
I would really give fifty thousand francs, every centime of it, to any
one who would aid me in the matter.'
'In that case,' replied Dupin,
opening a drawer,
and producing a check-book, 'you may as well fill me up a check for the
amount mentioned. When you have signed it, I will hand you the letter.'
I was astounded. The prefect appeared
absolutely
thunder-stricken. For some minutes he remained speechless and
motionless,
looking incredulously at my friend with open mouth, and eyes that
seemed
starting from their sockets; then, apparently recovering himself in
some
measure, he seized a pen, and after several pauses and vacant stares,
finally
filled up and signed a check for fifty thousand francs, and handed it
across
the table to Dupin. The latter examined it carefully and deposited it
in
his pocket-book; then, unlocking an escritoire, took thence a
letter
and gave it to the Prefect. This functionary grasped it in a perfect
agony
of joy, opened it with a trembling hand, cast a rapid glance at its
contents,
and then, scrambling and struggling to the door, rushed at length
unceremoniously
from the room and from the house, without having uttered a solitary
syllable
since Dupin had requested him to fill up the check.
When he had gone, my friend entered
into some
explanations.
'The Parisian police,' he said, 'are
exceedingly
able in their way. They are persevering, ingenious, cunning, and
thoroughly
versed in the knowledge which their duties seem chiefly to demand.
Thus,
when G—— detailed to us his mode of searching the premises at the Hotel
D——, I felt entire confidence in his having made a satisfactory
investigation
— so far as his labors extended.'
'So far as his labors extended?' said
I.
'Yes,' said Dupin. 'The measures
adopted were not
only the best of their kind, but carried out to absolute perfection.
Had
the letter been deposited within the range of their search, these
fellows
would, beyond a question, have found it.'
I merely laughed — but he seemed
quite serious in
all that he said.
'The measures, then,' he continued, '
were good
in
their kind, and well executed; their defect lay in their being
inapplicable
to the case, and to the man. A certain set of highly ingenious
resources
are, with the Prefect, a sort of Procrustean bed, to which he forcibly
adapts his designs. But he perpetually errs by being too deep or too
shallow,
for the matter in hand; and many a schoolboy is a better reasoner than
he. I knew one about eight years of age, whose success at guessing in
the
game of 'even and odd' attracted universal admiration. This game is
simple,
and is played with marbles. One player holds in his hand a number of
these
toys, and demands of another whether that number is even or odd. If the
guess is right, the guesser wins one; if wrong, he loses one. The boy
to
whom I allude won all the marbles of the school. Of course he had some
principle of guessing; and this lay in mere observation and
admeasurement
of the astuteness of his opponents. For example, an arrant simpleton is
his opponent, and, holding up his closed hand, asks, 'are they even or
odd?' Our schoolboy replies, 'odd,' and loses; but upon the second
trial
he wins, for he then says to himself, 'the simpleton had them even upon
the first trial, and his amount of cunning is just sufficient to make
him
have them odd upon the second; I will therefore guess odd;' — he
guesses
odd, and wins. Now, with a simpleton a degree above the first, he would
have reasoned thus: 'This fellow finds that in the first instance I
guessed
odd, and, in the second, he will propose to himself, upon the first
impulse,
a simple variation [column 2:] from even to odd,
as
did the first simpleton; but then a second thought will suggest that
this
is too simple a variation, and finally he will decide upon putting it
even
as before. I will therefore guess even;' — he guesses even, and wins.
Now
this mode of reasoning in the schoolboy, whom his fellows termed
'lucky,'
— what, in its last analysis, is it?'
'It is merely,' I said, 'an
identification of the
reasoner's intellect with that of his opponent.'
'It is,' said Dupin; 'and, upon
inquiring of the
boy by what means he effected the thorough identification in
which
his success consisted, I received answer as follows: 'When I wish to
find
out how wise, or how stupid, or how good, or how wicked is any one, or
what are his thoughts at the moment, I fashion the expression of my
face,
as accurately as possible, in accordance with the expression of his,
and
then wait to see what thoughts or sentiments arise in my mind or heart,
as if to match or correspond with the expression.' This response of the
schoolboy lies at the bottom of all the spurious profundity which has
been
attributed to Rochefoucault, to La Bougive, to Machiavelli, and to
Campanella.'
'And the identification,' I said, 'of
the
reasoner's
intellect with that of his opponent, depends, if I understand you
aright,
upon the accuracy with which the opponent's intellect is admeasured.'
'For its practical value it depends
upon this,'
replied
Dupin; 'and the Prefect and his cohort fail so frequently, first, by
default
of this identification, and, secondly, by ill-admeasurement, or rather
through non-admeasurement, of the intellect with which they are
engaged.
They consider only their own ideas of ingenuity; and, in
searching
for anything hidden, advert only to the modes in which they
would
have hidden it. They are right in this much — that their own ingenuity
is a faithful representative of that of the mass; but when the
cunning
of the individual felon is diverse in character from their own, the
felon
foils them, of course. This always happens when it is above their own,
and very usually when it is below. They have no variation of principle
in their investigations; at best, when urged by some unusual emergency
— by some extraordinary reward — they extend or exaggerate their old
modes
of practice, without touching their principles. What, for
example,
in this case of D——, has been done to vary the principle of action?
What
is all this boring, and probing, and sounding, and scrutinizing with
the
microscope, and dividing the surface of the building into registered
square
inches — what is it all but an exaggeration of the application
of
the one principle or set of principles of search, which are based upon
the one set of notions regarding human ingenuity, to which the Prefect,
in the long routine of his duty, has been accustomed? Do you not see he
has taken it for granted that all men proceed to conceal a
letter,
— not exactly in a gimlet-hole bored in a chair-leg — but, at least, in
some
out-of-the-way hole or corner suggested by the same tenor of thought
which
would urge a man to secrete a letter in a gimlet-hole bored in a
chair-leg?
And do you not see also, that such recherches nooks for
concealment
are adapted only for ordinary occasions, and would be adopted only by
ordinary
intellects; for, in all cases of concealment, a disposal of the article
concealed — a disposal of it in this recherché manner, —
is, in the very first instance, presumed and presumable; and thus its
discovery
depends, not at all upon the acumen, but altogether upon the mere care,
patience, and determination of the seekers; and where the case is of
importance
— or, what amounts to the same thing in the policial eyes, when the
reward
is of magnitude, — the qualities in question have
never been known
to fail. You will now understand what I meant in suggesting that, had
the
purloined letter been hidden any where within the limits of the
Prefect's
examination — in other words, had the principle of its concealment been
comprehended within the principles of the Prefect — its discovery would
have been a matter altogether beyond question. This functionary,
however,
has been thoroughly mystified; and the remote source of his defeat lies
in [page 346:] the supposition that the minister
would
do what he would have done himself — taken vast care to conceal the
letter
on account of its being so very precious. I went to work differently.
My
measures were adapted to the minister's capacity, with reference to the
circumstances by which he was surrounded. I knew him as a courtier,
too,
and as a bold intriguant. Such a man, I considered, could not
fail
to be aware of the ordinary policial modes of action. He could not have
failed to anticipate — and events have proved that he did not fail to
anticipate
— the waylayings to which he was subjected. He must have foreseen, I
reflected,
the secret investigations of his premises. His frequent absences from
home
at night, which were hailed by the Prefect as certain aids to his
success,
I regarded only as ruses, to afford opportunity for thorough
search
to the police, and thus the sooner to impress them with the conviction
to which G—, in fact, did finally arrive — the conviction that the
letter
was not upon the premises. I felt, also, that the whole train of
thought,
which I was at some pains in detailing to you just now, concerning the
invariable principle of policial action in searches for articles
concealed
— I felt that this whole train of thought would necessarily pass
through
the mind of the Minister. It would imperatively lead him to despise all
the ordinary nooks of concealment. He could not, I
reflected,
be so weak as not to see that the most intricate and remote recess of
his
hotel would be as open as his commonest closets to the eyes, to the
probes,
to the gimlets, and to the microscopes of the Prefect. I saw, in fine,
that he would be driven, as a matter of course, to simplicity,
if
not deliberately induced to it as a matter of choice. This conjecture
was
above or beneath the understanding of the Prefect. He never once
thought
it probable, or possible, that the Minister had deposited the letter
immediately
beneath the nose of the whole world, by way of best preventing any
portion
of that world from perceiving it.
'But the more I reflected upon the
daring,
dashing,
and discriminating ingenuity of D——; upon the fact that the document
must
always have been at hand, if he intended to use it to good
purpose;
and upon the decisive evidence, obtained by the Prefect, that it was
not
hidden within the limits of that dignitary's ordinary search — the more
satisfied I became that, to conceal this letter, the Minister had
resorted
to the comprehensive and sagacious expedient of not attempting to
conceal
it at all.
'Full of these ideas, I prepared
myself with a
pair
of green spectacles, and called one fine morning, quite by accident, at
the Ministerial hotel. I found D—— at home, yawning, lounging, and
dawdling,
as usual, and pretending to be in the last extremity of ennui.
He
is, perhaps, the most really energetic human being now alive — but that
is only when nobody sees him.
'To be even with him, I complained of
my weak
eyes,
and lamented the necessity of the spectacles, under cover of which I
cautiously
and thoroughly surveyed the whole apartment, while seemingly intent
only
upon the conversation of my host.
'I paid especial attention to a large
writing-table
near which he sat, and upon which lay confusedly, some miscellaneous
letters
and other papers, with one or two musical instruments and a few books.
Here, however, after a long and very deliberate scrutiny, I saw nothing
to excite particular suspicion.
'At length my eyes, in going the
circuit of the
room,
fell upon a trumpery fillagree card-rack of pasteboard, that hung
dangling
by a dirty blue riband, from a little brass knob just beneath the
middle
of the mantel-piece. In this rack, which had three or four
compartments,
were five or six visiting cards and a solitary letter. This last was
much
soiled and crumpled. It was torn nearly in two, across the middle — as
if a design, in the first instance, to tear it entirely up as
worthless,
had been altered, or stayed, in the second. It had a large black seal,
bearing the D—— cipher very conspicuously, and was addressed,
in
a diminutive female hand, to [column 2:] D——, the
minister,
himself. It was thrust carelessly, and even, as it seemed,
contemptuously,
into one of the uppermost divisions of the rack.
'No sooner had I glanced at this
letter, than I
concluded
it to be that of which I was in search. To be sure, it was, to all
appearance,
radically different from the one of which the Prefect had read us so
minute
a description. Here the seal was large and black, with the D—— cipher;
there it was small and red, with the ducal arms of the S—— family.
Here,
the address, to the Minister, diminutive and feminine; there the
superscription,
to a certain royal personage, was markedly bold and decided; the size
alone
formed a point of correspondence. But, then, the radicalness of
these differences, which was excessive; the dirt; the soiled and torn
condition
of the paper, so inconsistent with the true methodical habits
of
D——, and so suggestive of a design to delude the beholder into an idea
of the worthlessness of the document; these things, together with the
hyper-obtrusive
situation of this document, full in the view of every visiter, and thus
exactly in accordance with the conclusions to which I had previously
arrived;
these things, I say, were strongly corroborative of suspicion, in one
who
came with the intention to suspect.
'I protracted my visit as long as
possible, and,
while I maintained a most animated discussion with the Minister, upon a
topic which I knew well had never failed to interest and excite him, I
kept my attention really riveted upon the letter. In this examination,
I committed to memory its external appearance and arrangement in the
rack;
and also fell, at length, upon a discovery which set at rest whatever
trivial
doubt I might have entertained. In scrutinizing the edges of the paper,
I observed them to be more chafed than seemed necessary. They
presented
the broken appearance which is manifested when a stiff paper,
having
been once folded and pressed with a folder, is refolded in a reversed
direction,
in the same creases or edges which had formed the original fold. This
discovery
was sufficient. It was clear to me that the letter had been turned, as
a glove, inside out, re-directed, and re-sealed. I bade the Minister
good
morning, and took my departure at once, leaving a gold snuff-box upon
the
table.
'The next morning I called for the
snuff-box,
when
we resumed, quite eagerly, the conversation of the preceding day. While
thus engaged, however, a loud report, as if of a pistol, was heard
immediately
beneath the windows of the hotel, and
was
succeeded by a series of fearful screams, and the shoutings of a
terrified
mob. D—— rushed to a casement, threw it open, and looked out. In the
meantime,
I stepped to the card-rack took the letter, put it in my pocket, and
replaced
it by a fac-simile, which I had carefully prepared at my
lodgings
— imitating the D—— cipher, very readily, by means of a seal formed of
bread.
'The disturbance in the street had
been
occasioned
by the frantic behavior of a man with a musket. He had fired it among a
crowd of women and children. It proved, however, to have been without
ball,
and the fellow was suffered to go his way as a lunatic or a drunkard.
When
he had gone, D—— came from the window, whither I had followed him
immediately
upon securing the object in view. Soon afterwards I bade him farewell.
The pretended lunatic was a man in my own pay.'
'But what purpose had you,' I asked,
'in
replacing
the letter by a fac-simile? Would it not have been better, at
the
first visit, to have seized it openly, and departed?'
'D——,' replied Dupin, 'is a desperate
man, and a
man of nerve. His hotel, too, is not without attendants devoted to his
interests. Had I made the wild attempt you suggest, I should never have
left the Ministerial presence alive. The good people of Paris would
have
heard of me no more. But I had an object apart from these
considerations.
You know my political prepossessions. In this matter, I act as a
partisan
of the lady concerned. For eighteen months the Minister has had [page
347:] her in his power. She has now him in hers — since,
being
unaware that the letter is not in his possession, he will proceed with
his exactions as if it was. Thus will he inevitably commit himself, at
once, to his political destruction. His downfall, too, will not be more
precipitate than awkward. It is all very well to talk about the facilis
descensus Averni; but in all kinds of climbing, as Catalini
[[Catalani]]
said of singing, it is far more easy to get up than to come down. In
the
present instance I have no sympathy — at least no pity — for him who
descends.
He is that monstrum horrendum, an unprincipled man of genius. I
confess, however, that I should like very well to know the precise
character
of his thoughts, when, being defied by her whom the Prefect terms 'a
certain
personage' he is reduced to opening the letter which I left for him in
the card-rack.'
'How? did you put any thing
particular in it?'
'Why — it did not seem altogether
right to leave
the interior blank — that would have been insulting. To be sure, D——,
at
Vienna once, did me an evil turn, which I told him, quite
good-humoredly,
that I should remember. So, as I knew he would feel some curiosity in
regard
to the identity of the person who had outwitted him, I thought it a
pity
not to give him a clue. He is well acquainted with my manuscript, and I
just copied into the middle of the blank sheet the words —
"
'———— Un dessein si funeste,
S'il n'est digne d'Atrée, est digne de Thyeste. |
They are to be found in Crébillon's "Atrée." |
|